Child Language Teaching and Therapy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, E.
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 20, No. 3, 261-285 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0265659004ct275oa

Evidence-based management of phonological impairment in children

Elise Baker

School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Sharynne McLeod

School of Teacher Education, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia

Evidence-based management of phonological impairment in children is a dynamic process. Speech and language therapists need to evaluate published evidence and use their professional judgement to decide on an intervention plan, evaluate the efficacy of their intervention and re-evaluate decisions. Two case studies are presented to illustrate this process of evidence-based management of phonological impairment in children. Both of the children have a phonological impairment of unknown origin with similar case histories; however, their intervention outcomes were completely different. The two case studies highlight the importance of considering individual differences in the management of phonological impairment in children. They also highlight the importance of integrating up-to-date knowledge with clinical expertise.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
T. W. Powell
The Use of Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments for Developmental Speech Sound Production Disorders: Interventions and Interactions
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 374 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
D. M. Ruscello
Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatment Issues Related to Children With Developmental Speech Sound Disorders
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 380 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
B. Bernhardt
Editorial: Maximizing success in phonological intervention
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2004; 20(3): 195 - 198.
[PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
S. McLeod and K. Bleile
The ICF: a framework for setting goals for children with speech impairment
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2004; 20(3): 199 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
E. Baker and B. Bernhardt
From hindsight to foresight: working around barriers to success in phonological intervention
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2004; 20(3): 287 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]