Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nettelbladt, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Interactional style, elicitation strategies and language production in professional language intervention

Barbro Bruce

Department of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Sweden, barbro.bruce{at}med.lu.se

Kristina Hansson

Department of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Sweden

Ulrika Nettelbladt

Department of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Sweden

This paper explores language intervention for children with specific language impairment in Sweden. The elicitation strategies, style of interaction and language production used by speech and language pathologists (SLPs) were analyzed in two conditions, free conversation and training of grammar. In training, the grammatical targets were used significantly more often by the SLPs, but not by the children. In the free conversations the children talked more and had significantly higher mean length of utterance in words and the SLPs linked significantly more to the child's focus. The two conditions represent different, but complementary approaches to language intervention.

Key Words: language intervention • specific language impairment • elicitation strategies • style of interaction • intervention context

References

  • Bishop, D. 1983: The Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG). Swedish translation: Holmberg, E. and Lundälv, E. 1996. Göteborg: SIH Läromedel.
  • Camarata, S., and Nelson, K. 2006: Conversational recast intervention with preschool and older children. In McCauley, R. and Fey, M., editors, Treatment of language disorders, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 47—75.
  • Camarata, S., Nelson, K. and Camarata, M. 1994: Comparison of conversational-recasting and imitative procedures for training grammatical structures in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 1414—23.
  • Cohen J. 1988: Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cole, K. and Dale, P. 1986: Direct language instruction and interactive language instruction with language delayed preschool children: a comparison study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29, 206—17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dethorne, L., Johnson, B. and Loeb, J. 2005: A closer look at MLU: What does it really measure? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 19(8), 635—48.[CrossRef]
  • Ellis Weismer, S. and Murray-Branch, J. 1989: Modelling versus modelling plus evoked production training: A comparison of two language intervention methods. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54, 269—81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Ellis Weismer, S. and Robertson, S. 2006: Focused stimulation approach to language intervention. In McCauley, R. and Fey, M., editors, Treatment of language disorders, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 175—201.
  • Fey, M. 1986: Language intervention with young children Boston, MA: College-Hill.
  • Fey, M. and Proctor-Williams, K. 2000: Recasting, elicited imitation and modelling in grammar intervention for children with specific language impairments. In Bishop, D. and Leonard, L., editors, Speech and language impairment in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome, Hove: Psychology Press, 177—97.
  • Friedman, P. and Friedman, K. 1980: Accounting for individual differences when comparing the effectiveness of remedial language teaching methods. Applied Psycholinguistics 1, 151—70.
  • Hancock, T. and Kaiser, A. 2006: Enhanced milieu training. In M cCauley, R. and Fey, M., editors, Treatment of language disorders, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 203—36.
  • Hansson, K. and Nettelbladt, U. 2004: Gramba. Grammatiktest för barn. Malmö, Sweden: Pedagogisk Design.
  • Hellquist, B. 1989: Nya SIT — Språkligt Impressivt Test för Barn. Malmö, Sweden: Pedagogisk Design.
  • Howell, J. and Dean, E. 1991: Treating phonological disorders in children: Metaphon — theory to practice, second edition London: Whurr.
  • Johnston, J. 1985: Fit, focus, and functionality: An essay on early language intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 1, 125—34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Johnston, J. 2006: Thinking about child language: Research to practice Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
  • Law, J. 2004. The close association between classification and intervention for children with primary language impairments. In Verhoven, L. and Balkom, H.v., editors, Classification of developmental language disorders: Theoretical issues and clinical implications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 401—19.
  • Leissner, I., Nilsson, B., Nyström, G. and Wastesson, B. 1962: Leiters Klosstest Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget.
  • MacWhinney, B. 2000: The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, third edition Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Miller, J. and Yoder, D. 1974: An ontogenetic language teaching strategy for retarded children. In Schiefelbusch, R. and Lloyd, L., editors, Language perspectives-acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  • Nettelbladt, U., Hansson, K. and Nilholm, C. 2001: Why ask questions? Contextual effects on grammatical structure in the language production of children with specific language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 17(2), 89—106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Rice, M. 1991: Children with specific language impairment: Toward a model of teachability. In Krasnegor, N., Rumbaugh, D., Schiefelbusch R. and Studdert-Kennedy, M. Biological and behavioural determinants of language development, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 447—80.
  • Saxton, M. 2005: `Recast' in a new light: insights for practice from typical language studies. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 21(1), 23—38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Shriberg, L. and Kwiatkowski, J. 1982: Phonological disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47, 256—70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Warren, S. and Kaiser, A. 1986: Incidental language teaching: A critical review. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 51, 291—99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Warren, S. and Yoder, P. 2004. Early intervention for young children with language impairments. In Verhoven, L. and Balkom, H.v., editors, Classification of developmental language disorders: Theoretical issues and clinical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 367—81.
  • Wertsch, J. 1985: Vygotsky and the social formation of mind Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Yoder, P. and Davies, B. 1990: Do parental questions and topic continuations elicit replies from developmentally delayed children?: A sequential analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 563—73.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Yoder, P., Kaiser, A. and Alpert, C. 1991: An exploratory study of the interaction between language teaching methods and child characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 155—67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Yoder, P., Davies, B., Bishop, K. and Munson, L. 1994: Effect of adult continuing wh-questions on conversational participation in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 193—204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 253-266 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0265659007080677


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nettelbladt, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?