Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Watterson, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of phonological versus language intervention in preschoolers with both phonological and language impairment

Ann A. Tyler

University of Nevada, Reno

Kathye H. Watterson

University of Nevada, Reno

Preschool children with both phonological and language impairment received either phonological intervention involving a 'cycles' approach or language intervention involving a 'script' approach. Pre- and post treatment measures of linguistic and phonological performance were compared to determine which domains exhibited the greatest improve ment. There were no significant differences for either intervention group; however, the language intervention group improved slightly in language and regressed in phonology, while the phonological interven tion group improved in both language and phonology. It is suggested that the observed interactions among linguistic domains during treat ment were influenced by both the type of treatment and different synergistic relationships between the subject groups' language and phonological disorders.

Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 7, No. 2, 141-160 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/026565909100700203
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
E. Baker and S. McLeod
Evidence-based management of phonological impairment in children
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2004; 20(3): 261 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
M. M. Watson and G. P. Scukanec
Profiling the phonological abilities of 2-year-olds: a longitudinal investigation
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 1997; 13(1): 3 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
A. A. Tyler
Profiles of the relationship between phonology and language in late talkers
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, January 1, 1992; 8(3): 246 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]