Child Language Teaching and Therapy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milloy, N.
Right arrow Articles by Summers, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 5, No. 3, 287-303 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026565908900500304

Six years on — do claims still hold? Four children reassessed on a procedure to identify developmental articulatory dyspraxia

Nancy Milloy

Leicester Polytechnic

Lesley Summers

Alderwasley Hall School, Matlock

To test the predictive ability claimed for the Milloy Assessment of Praxis (MAP), four children were reassessed six years after the last administra tion of the procedure. Results indicate that the claim is justified: children diagnosed after three administrations of MAP at six-monthly intervals, either continue to present with characteristics of developmental articula tory dyspraxia or show the expected improvements predicted for immature articulatory praxis. Speech therapy intervention programmes in each case are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?