Child Language Teaching and Therapy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landa, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Olswang, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 4, No. 2, 170-192 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/026565908800400204

Effectiveness of language elicitation tasks with two-year-olds

Rebecca M. Landa

Johns Hopkins University

Lesley B. Olswang

University of Washington

One unstructured and two structured language sampling conditions were compared to determine the ways in which different types of structure would affect 2-year-olds' productions of the possessor + possession semantic relation. In the unstructured, naturalistic condition, the clinician followed the child's lead and responded in ways that would encourage the produc tion of the possessive construction. In the structured conditions, the clinician utilized wh-questions and sentence completion tasks to elicit the possessive construction. While the subjects produced a greater quantity and diversity of possessive constructions in the structured conditions, no differences were observed between the two types of linguistic elicitation techniques. Implications for sampling language with young children are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
N. Bozic, L. Cooper, A. Etheridge, and A. Selby
Microcomputer-based joint activities in communication intervention with visually impaired children: a case study
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 1995; 11(1): 91 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]