Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crosbie, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dodd, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cognitive flexibility in children with and without speech disorder

Sharon Crosbie

Perinatal Research Centre, University of Queensland

Alison Holm

Perinatal Research Centre, University of Queensland

Barbara Dodd

Perinatal Research Centre, University of Queensland, bdodd{at}somc.uq.edu.au

Most children's speech difficulties are `functional' (i.e. no known sensory, motor or intellectual deficits). Speech disorder may, however, be associated with cognitive deficits considered core abilities in executive function: rule abstraction and cognitive flexibility. The study compares the rule abstraction and cognitive flexibility of children with speech disorder and typically developing controls. Three groups of five-year-old children (typically developing, consistent atypical speech disorder and inconsistent speech disorder) were assessed on the Flexible Item Selection Test (Jacques and Zelazo, 2001). Children were shown a set of three cards and asked to select two that matched on one dimension (selection 1: abstraction). Children were then asked to select a different pair of cards that matched on another dimension (selection 2: flexibility). The children with consistent atypical speech disorder performed worse than the other two groups on selections 1 and 2. The children with an inconsistent speech disorder performed similarly to their typically developing peers. Children who use consistent atypical error patterns have difficulties with rule abstraction and flexibility that are not confined to the linguistic system. The results are discussed in terms of the deficits underlying different types of speech disorders.

Key Words: differential diagnosis • executive function • rule abstraction • speech errors

Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 25, No. 2, 250-270 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0265659009102990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?