Child Language Teaching and Therapy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here for free online access to SAGE language and linguistics journals

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conti-Ramsden, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 2, No. 1, 43-49 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/026565908600200104

'Can you put the blocks away?' Language-impaired children's comprehension of indirect requests

Gina Conti-Ramsden

University of Manchester

Despite the frequent use of indirect requests in the assessment and intervention of language disorders, the study of language-impaired children's comprehension of these forms is only just emerging. The present investigation aims to further our knowledge in this area by examining language-impaired children's understanding of indirect requests in two situations: (a) one situation in which the experimenter gives the instructions to the child in a structured way, presenting each instruction once only, and (b) another situation where the mother gives the instructions to the child in an unrestricted, more natural way. The results suggest that language- impaired children, unlike normal language learners of the same language stage, behave significantly differently in the two situations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?