Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Botting, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Narrative as a tool for the assessment of linguistic and pragmatic impairments

Nicola Botting

University of Manchester, nicola.botting{at}man.ac.uk

Narrative ability is one of the most interesting and ecologically valid ways in which to measure communicative competence both in normal populations and in clinical groups, since narratives form the basis of many childhood speech acts. Narrative may also prove to be a good tool for distinguishing clinical groups who show overlapping symptoms but who are thought to experience subtly different impairments. This article gives an overview of some of the theoretical reasons for using narrative to assess both linguistic and pragmatic impairments. As part of a preliminary investigation examining possible similarities and differences across groups, five children with severe pragmatic language impairments (PLI) and five with more typical specific language impairments (SLI) completed short picture based narratives using the Bus Story and the Frog Story. These illustrative data are included throughout the paper to highlight features of use to clinicians, particularly with respect to differences in the narratives of children with PLI compared to their peers with SLI. Furthermore, when compared to Tager-Flusberg’s (1995) data from children with autism, SLI narratives seem to be more similar to those of the group with autism than did PLI narratives. Narrative ability was found to relate directly to pragmatic skill but in different ways according to clinical subgroup. Implications for both theory and practice are discussed.

Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1-21 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0265659002ct224oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
S.-A. Epstein and J. Phillips
Storytelling skills of children with specific language impairment
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2009; 25(3): 285 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
C. Adams, J. Baxendale, J. Lloyd, and C. Aldred
Pragmatic language impairment: case studies of social and pragmatic language therapy
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2005; 21(3): 227 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
C R. Wagner and U Nettelbladt
Tor: Case study of a boy with autism between the age of three and eight
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 2005; 21(2): 123 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]