Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, S.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A prelingually deaf child's acquisition of spoken vocabulary in the first year of multichannel cochlear implant use

Suzi Willis

Manchester Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme

Jo Edwards

Manchester Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme

Professionals working with prelingually, profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants must be able to give both qualitative and quantitative information regarding vocabulary acquisition and all areas of language development. The following investigation is an initial attempt to address this need. This single subject study evaluated a 4-year-old, prelingually, profoundly deaf child's acquisition of receptive and expressive spoken vocabulary in the first year of multichannel cochlear implant use. Three standardized assessments were utilized to evaluate these areas of langu age development. A prelingually deaf child, after 12 months of cochlear implant use can be described as having a 'hearing age' of 12 months. It was hypothesized that the subject of this study would be more likely to acquire vocabulary at a rate similar to that of a hearing-age control, rather than that of a chronological-age control. In order to test this hypothesis, comparisons were made with standardized data for nor mally-hearing children. It was found that this child acquired vocabulary at approximately twice the rate of a hearing age control.

Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 272-286 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026565909601200303
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
D. Crystal
Sense: the final frontier
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 1998; 14(1): 1 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]