Child Language Teaching and Therapy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schairer, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 164-180 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026565909601200206

Communicative possibilities of written conversations with adolescents who have autism

Kim S. Schairer

Western Michigan University

Nickola Wolf Nelson

Western Michigan University

Oral and written conversations were held with three adolescents with autism in 15-20-minute sessions over a 15-week period. The discourse of several oral and written sessions was transcribed, and coded for mean length of utterance, communicative functions, turn-taking, and topic matching. These features were compared within and across participants for modality effects. Results showed a range of individual discourse styles, with two participants showing more elaborate language and two participants relying less on partners to carry the conversation in the written modality. One of the three participants also took significantly more non-obligatory turns and never passed an obligatory turn in writing but did orally. This individual also matched his partner's topic significantly more often in written than in oral conversations. If written capabilities exceed oral performance, written communication might provide supplemental or alternative methods to teach students with autism in the classroom or to enhance social communication across settings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?